Monitoring and standardization expenses

Case law - Validation of time spent on technology watch - June 2018

BOFIP tends to exclude time devoted to technology watch as long as it does not relate to scientific congresses.

The judges confirmed the case law established by the Administrative Court of Appeal of Paris (CAA de Paris of 11/30/2016, n ° 15PA000710, Sté Galea et associés & of 12/15/2016, n ° 15PA01925, Sté Piercan) , validating the personnel costs under technological watch expenses but by imposing increased requirements on the supporting documents to be provided (preparation of reports) as well as on the link to be established with the R&D operations.

While this position recognizes the eligibility of hours devoted to this activity, it raises questions about the very definition of technology watch. Given that this is a permanent cycle of updating knowledge with a view to detecting new avenues of development, it is not systematic that this activity is linked to a project at the time of the facts.

Source: Nantes CAA from 06/28/2018

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
E-mail

Articles in Relationship

Charte de la Diversité

G.A.C.Group est fière de s’engager socialement en rejoignant les 4 100 membres signataires de la Charte de la Diversité !

Keep in touch !Subscribe to the newsletter

CAPTCHA image

* Please fill in the required fields.

In accordance with the provisions of the regulations on the protection of personal data, GAC, as data controller, processes your data in order to respond to your request related to GAC products and services.
In accordance with the regulations in force, you have the right to access, rectify, delete and oppose your personal data. You can assert these rights by contacting our DPO at: dpo@group-gac.com and by proving your identity. You can also lodge a complaint with the CNIL. Learn more.

Scroll to Top